On "A New Way of Thinking" (Anonymous)

The Problem clearly exposed. Go read and think. Sheet. So right.
http://newsjunkiepost.com/2010/03/01/a-new-way-of-thinking/

"As a consequence the internet as proven to be a generally more effective at disseminating disinformation than information. Because it works within existing networks it can strengthen and facilitate the actions of a healthy progressive movement, but -->not substitute for it, nor create it.<--"

Social media ARE effective, but definitely INSUFFICIENT. We need a new "CONCRETE CULTURE" -- off the Internet gateways.

"[...] Movement in that people are always on the move and interchangeable. They do not bond to place or one another, but rather move between increasingly uniform jobs, neighbourhoods and social circles to which they feel no particular allegiance. Speed in that the value is placed on doing everything faster, more efficiently. Natural, human values are slow and take time. Sex can be done quickly and efficiently, love cannot."

Our current lifestyle is unsustainable. We need to slow down, and find a way to "sacrifice" the non-critical, high-energy activities: travelling for fun, drive back and forth to work daily, individually buy electronics for entertainment -- funny hey, all these induced individual needs become simply useless if we learn to LIVE CLOSER ONE TO ANOTHER and start SHARING space, transportation, goods, food produce, books, knowledge, ideas -- the real stuff... Will materialism save us, AFTER ALL?

"[...] In seeking solutions we usually look for culprits in the forms of institutions and individuals, when they are entirely interchangeable and -->the real culprit is the entire value set and our way of understanding how we can and should live<--."

Right on the money, Bill.

"We need to educate ourselves about the possibilities that we have not even conceived and begin to build the structures and processes that will allow us to implement the broader range strategies and tactics that will get us where we want to go."

Nothing will change if we don't change ourselves. Sounds good, but will hurt, honey. So beware, prepare, share, and LET'S CHANGE ALL THIS.

The New Music Industry: An Appeal to Independent Artists

I stumbled upon a very intelligent manifesto by Ben Johnson, the creator of indietorrent.com, a small but promising website that offers free digital music distribution service for independant artists. His manifesto is truly brilliant, and inspiring.

https://indietorrent.org/v1/docs/manifesto.php

In particular, i'd like to cite this interesting insight into social networking, because, my Facebook so-called "friends" might have noticed, I'm quite questioning the social media phenomenum since a little while:

While it may be difficult to prove, many "community" websites, like MySpace and Facebook, are not meant to serve the community at all. In fact, many such "social networking" sites exist only as façades for the massive effort to construct databases full of information about Americans (and foreigners), their interests, preferences, personal details, attitudes towards particular subjects, reactions to contrived events (which are peddled as "news" through the mainstream media), etc. Facebook and MySpace are the very simply the polling arms of questionable (if not sinister) organizations and their sole function is to determine how many people are buying the "movie version" of events, and to what extent. The fact that MySpace and other data-mining operations sell the amassed data and use the profit to fund the further manipulation of this vicious systems' unwitting participants (who happen to be you and me) is entirely secondary to what's going on under the covers. We would do well to note that most (but not all) "free services" are offered only to divert attention from an underlying (and often nefarious) data-mining agenda.

By the way, I hate the new (is it new? I guess not) WYSIWYG editor of Blogger. I know, I'm a geek. If it's not plain text, it's bad.

How I Got There (Like If You Ever Cared) :

1. Was encoding Peter Peter's tunes for digital distribution in MP3, OGG and FLAC (a lossless audio coded).
2. Was making a "badge" icon for , and wanted to make sure what FLAC stands for.
3. Googled "FLAC", ended up on the FLAC sourceforge website, learning that it simply means "Free Lossless Audio Codec", as well as it is a very interesting and successful codec.
4. Among other very surprising headlines, this one got my attention: A new site called indietorrent.org is up and running. indietorrent.org is a digital music store which "enables independent musicians to sell their own music while keeping all profits." FLAC is one of the available formats.

Can brain science manipulate consumers?

By Catherine Loiacono

"[...] The study revealed that images of dominant brands, such as the iPod, stimulated the same part of the brain activated by religious symbols. It also found that warning labels on cigarette packages stimulate activity in a brain area associated with craving – despite the fact that subjects said they thought the warnings were effective. The study also found that product placement in movies and television rarely worked and the Nokia tune turns people off."

Read the full article:
http://www.publicaffairs.ubc.ca/ubcreports/2009/09apr02/manipulate.html?src=ubcca

Who Pulls the Wireless Strings?

It's not a localized phenomenum, it happens world-wide: wireless technologies are literally flooding into everyone's life. But are we aware of how they are really impacting us?

Who among us didn't make the acquisition of a new technology device in the last 12 months? Ask the question to people surrounding you, and you'll be surprised. Odds are very high that they did, and you can expect that at least one of their new gizmos is a wireless device of any sort.

Although this tendency might seem to be more acute in our industrialized countries and apply only to wealthy people, it is actually a generalized world-wide trend: poor children get equipped with wireless laptops,
refurbished cell phones are being provided to homeless people...

As technology bursts seeminglessly into our lives, it dramatically changes our ways of living. In just the few last years, maybe without even noticing it, we lost a great level of intimacy and privacy. It's affecting us drastically. But when we accept the "intrusion" of these devices into our life, do we ask ourselves where is it leading us to?

Is there a Plan Superior? Who's will is it serving? Are people asking themselves what is the bottom line of being surrounded by technologic stuff? Is it really beneficial for all of us, is it only for those high-tech companies, or are we only running that race without any concern about the long-term consequences?

It seems that we systematically develop and market new technology products only because it's achievable, without questioning the sense of doing so. Maybe it's an inherent (or natural) tendency of human beings; and thus one might propose that, being dictated by instinct, it obviously follows some 'natural plan'... Maybe we're on the way to a new level of interdependancy between elements of humanity, in which our individual identities will slowly merge into a global being, a plural consciousness, a vast noos in which we will (eventually) coexist in an harmonious metabolism. We might be coming to that point.

On the other hand, I doubt that those mortals who actually pull the industry strings (might they be wireless strings!) are actually concerned about the noos conception... If there is some sort of above-us plan that's being achieved, indeed it's through some sort of quite an ironical fate!